New Delhi: Exterior Affairs Minister, Dr S Jaishankar, has dismissed claims that the US performed a vital function in brokering the current ceasefire between India and Pakistan. As an alternative, he credited India’s army actions for forcing Pakistan to conform to a halt in hostilities.
Throughout an interview with the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Jaishankar made these remarks, stating that the ceasefire was agreed upon by means of direct contact between army commanders of each side, following India’s efficient strikes on Pakistan’s most important airbases and air protection system.
He mentioned, “The cessation of firing was agreed between the army commanders of each side by means of direct contact. The morning earlier than, we successfully hit and incapacitated Pakistan’s most important airbases and air defence system. So, who ought to I thank for the cessation of hostilities? I thank the Indian army as a result of it was the Indian army motion that made Pakistan say: We’re able to cease.”
Exterior Affairs Minister dismissed issues that the India-Pakistan standoff throughout Operation Sindoor practically escalated right into a nuclear battle, labeling such claims as “baseless and alarmist”.
He emphasised that India’s army actions, not exterior mediation, drove Pakistan to conform to a ceasefire. When requested how shut the world was to nuclear conflict, Jaishankar replied, “Very, very far-off. I am frankly astonished by your query”
Dr S Jaishankar clarified that Operation Sindoor focused terrorist hideouts in Pakistan with exact and managed measures. After Pakistan’s army responded with fireplace, India demonstrated its functionality to disable their air protection techniques, resulting in a ceasefire request from Pakistan.
He mentioned, “We had terrorist targets. These had been very measured, fastidiously thought of, and non-escalating steps. After that, the Pakistani army opened fireplace on us. We had been capable of present them that we might disable their air defence techniques. Then the firing stopped at their request.”
Jaishankar criticized the West’s tendency to hyperlink South Asian conflicts to nuclear crises, calling it “disturbing” and highlighting that this narrative might inadvertently encourage terrorism. “Something that occurs in South Asia is promptly linked to a nuclear disaster by the West,” he mentioned, calling the narrative “disturbing” and warning that it inadvertently “encourages horrible actions like terrorism”, Jaishankar added.
India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire on Might 10, following three days of cross-border clashes. The battle started when India performed airstrikes on terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir on Might 7, in response to the Pahalgam terror assault that killed 26 individuals.
Pakistan retaliated with drone assaults on Indian army installations and civilian areas, prompting India to focus on Pakistani army installations, inflicting vital injury. Shortly after, the Pakistani army reached out to their Indian counterparts, and a ceasefire was negotiated.
When requested concerning the proximity to nuclear battle between India and Pakistan, Exterior Affairs Minister S Jaishankar expressed astonishment, stating that the state of affairs was “very, very far-off” from such a situation. He emphasised that India’s actions had been focused and measured, aimed toward terrorist targets, and that Pakistan’s army response was met with a managed counter-attack that disabled their air protection techniques, resulting in a ceasefire request.
Jaishankar criticized the Western narrative that South Asian conflicts inevitably result in nuclear crises, noting that this attitude can inadvertently encourage terrorism.
“Very, very far-off. I am frankly astonished by your query. We now have terrorist targets. These had been very measured, fastidiously thought of, and non-escalating steps. After that, the Pakistani army opened fireplace on us. We had been capable of present them that we might disable their air protection techniques. Then the firing stopped at their request. At no level was a nuclear degree reached.”
“There’s a narrative as if the whole lot that occurs in our a part of the world leads on to a nuclear downside. That disturbs me lots as a result of it encourages horrible actions like terrorism. If something, way more is going on with the nuclear situation in your a part of the world,” he replied.