NEW DELHI: The Supreme Courtroom on Friday rejected to listen to a Public Curiosity Litigation (PIL) that known as for a committee, headed by a retired Supreme Courtroom decide, to independently study Air India’s security and upkeep requirements.The petition, filed final month after crash sought a complete security audit of Air India’s fleet by a world aviation security company accredited by the Worldwide Civil Aviation Group (ICAO).The Air India Flight 171 was crashed on June 12. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, flying from Ahmedabad to London, went down shortly after take-off, crashing right into a medical hostel complicated close to the airport. Out of 241 folks on board, just one passenger survived. This was the primary deadly crash involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner.Throughout the listening to, the Supreme Courtroom questioned why the plea solely targeted on Air India.“Why simply Air India? Why not different airways?” the bench requested, declining to confess the plea.The courtroom was crucial of the petitioner for concentrating on just one airline, saying, “It was a really unlucky incident. However simply because a tragedy occurred, must you goal a single airline? Are there no questions of safety with different airways?”“Do not give an impression that you’re serving the reason for a rival non-public airline,” the bench added.The courtroom suggested the petitioner to boost security issues with the Directorate Normal of Civil Aviation (DGCA) or the Union authorities first.“If you wish to guarantee security, then method the DGCA or Union govt and make all airways, home and worldwide, topic to scrutiny. If the authorities don’t do something, then solely we are going to intervene,” the highest courtroom mentioned.