What? Man refused to work throughout leaves, supervisor places him on PIP | – The Occasions of India


At a time when discussions on work-life steadiness is a scorching matter, a put up by an worker who refused to work throughout his leaves has gone viral on the web. Why? Effectively, the worker claims that his supervisor pressured him to work on his day-offs and when he did not comply, he was placed on Efficiency Enchancment Plan (PIP)!
The viral social media put up has reignited the dialog round poisonous workplaces— and it’s struck a chord with many individuals. The put up, which was initially shared on Reddit, particulars one man’s troubling expertise at a brand new firm the place he says he was unfairly positioned on a PIP simply 5 months into the job for not being obtainable to work throughout his authorised leaves.
In accordance with the put up, the worker claimed his supervisor anticipated him to be continuously obtainable— even throughout his paid day without work which included weekends and leaves. When he refused saying he might be travelling, issues rapidly went downhill. The supervisor, reportedly dismissive of his refusal, responded with a snide comment: “I’d prefer to see that.”
Quickly after getting back from his leaves, the worker observed his supervisor’s perspective had turned chilly in direction of him. Later that day, the HR referred to as with a surprising information that he had been placed on a PIP as a result of “poor efficiency.”
In the identical Reddit put up, the worker additionally shared extra in regards to the firm’s tradition. The organisation follows a six-day work week, along with his supervisor anticipating workers to additionally put in 5–6 hours of labor even on Sundays, the person claimed. “We’re continuously chasing unrealistic deadlines,” he added.
He additional questioned, “Is that this even authorized? Can corporations actually do that? Don’t workers have any safety from such poisonous therapy?”
His put up rapidly picked up traction on-line, and plenty of netizens expressed their disbelief, calling the therapy “unfair” and “disgraceful.” One consumer stated, “Doc the whole lot—your efficiency critiques, objectives, and suggestions. And begin in search of a greater job ASAP.” Whereas one other stated, “Because of this folks transfer overseas. At the least managers there don’t query your proper to take day without work.”
What are your views on this specific incident? Do you suppose the worker was proper to neglect work when his friends had been complying or was the supervisor being too harsh on him? Inform us about it within the feedback part beneath.

Shubman Gill clarifies relationship standing