US President Donald Trump speaks to the press as staff set up a big flag pole on the South Garden of the White Home in Washington, DC on June 18, 2025.
Brendan Smialowski | Afp | Getty Photographs
A federal decide on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump‘s administration from forcing 20 Democratic-led states to cooperate with immigration enforcement with a purpose to obtain billions of {dollars} in transportation grant funding.
Chief U.S. District Decide John McConnell in Windfall, Rhode Island, granted the states’ request for an injunction barring the Division of Transportation’s coverage, saying the states have been more likely to succeed on the deserves of some or all of their claims.
The Trump administration didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The ruling got here in a lawsuit filed by a bunch of Democratic state attorneys common who argued the administration was looking for to unlawfully maintain federal funds hostage to coerce them into adhering to Trump’s hardline immigration agenda.
The states argued U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy lacked the authority to impose immigration-enforcement circumstances on funding that Congress appropriated to assist states maintain roads, highways, bridges and different transportation tasks.
Since returning to workplace on Jan. 20, Trump has signed a number of government orders which have referred to as for chopping off federal funding to so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that don’t cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as his administration has moved to conduct mass deportations.
Sanctuary jurisdictions typically have legal guidelines and insurance policies that restrict or forestall native legislation enforcement from helping federal officers with civil immigration arrests.
The Justice Division has filed a sequence of lawsuits in opposition to such jurisdictions, together with Illinois, New York and Colorado, difficult legal guidelines in these Democratic-led states that it says hinder federal immigration enforcement.
The lawsuit earlier than McConnell, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, was filed after Duffy on April 24 notified states they may lose transportation funding if they don’t cooperate with the enforcement of federal legislation, together with with ICE in its efforts to implement immigration legislation.
The states argue that coverage is improper and quantities to an unconstitutionally ambiguous situation on the states’ capacity to obtain funding approved by Congress because it leaves unclear what precisely would represent sufficient cooperation.
The administration has argued the coverage was inside Duffy’s discretion and that circumstances must be upheld as there’s nothing improper about requiring states to adjust to federal legislation.
The 20 states are individually pursuing an identical case additionally in Rhode Island difficult new immigration enforcement circumstances that the Homeland Safety Division imposed on grant applications.