The emblem of the BBC is displayed above the doorway of Broadcasting Home on November 12, 2025 in London, England.
Leon Neal | Getty Photographs Information | Getty Photographs
U.S. President Donald Trump mentioned on Friday he would seemingly sue the BBC subsequent week for as a lot as $5 billion after the British broadcaster admitted it wrongly edited a video of a speech he gave however insisted there was no authorized foundation for his declare.
The British Broadcasting Company has been plunged into its largest disaster in a long time after two senior leaders resigned following accusations of bias, together with over the modifying of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol.
Trump’s legal professionals had initially set a Friday deadline for the BBC to retract its documentary or face a lawsuit for “no much less” than $1 billion.
Additionally they demanded an apology and compensation for what they known as “overwhelming reputational and monetary hurt,” in accordance with a letter seen by Reuters.
The BBC, which has admitted its modifying of Trump’s remarks was an “error of judgement,” despatched a private apology to Trump on Thursday however mentioned it might not rebroadcast the documentary and rejected the defamation declare.
“We’ll sue them for anyplace between $1 billion and $5 billion, most likely someday subsequent week,” Trump informed reporters aboard Air Power One as he headed to Florida for the weekend.
“I believe I’ve to try this, I imply they’ve even admitted that they cheated,” he mentioned. “They modified the phrases popping out of my mouth.”
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks on the day he’s set to signal an govt order on “Fostering the Future” within the East Room of the White Home, in Washington, D.C., U.S., Nov. 13, 2025.
Jonathan Ernst | Reuters
Trump mentioned he had not spoken with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, with whom he has constructed a stable relationship, concerning the challenge, however that he deliberate to name him this weekend. He mentioned Starmer had tried to achieve him, and was “very embarrassed” by the incident.
The documentary, which aired on the BBC’s flagship “Panorama” information program, spliced collectively three video excerpts from Trump’s speech, creating the impression he was inciting the January 6, 2021, riot. His legal professionals mentioned this was “false and defamatory.”
‘Past faux, that is corrupt’
In an interview with British right-leaning TV channel GB Information, Trump mentioned the edit was “unattainable to imagine” and in contrast it to election interference.
“I made an attractive assertion, they usually made it right into a not stunning assertion,” he mentioned. “Pretend information was an excellent time period, besides it isn’t sturdy sufficient. That is past faux, that is corrupt.”
Trump mentioned the BBC’s apology was not sufficient. “While you say it is unintentional, I assume if it is unintentional, you do not apologize,” he mentioned. “They clipped collectively two components of the speech that have been practically an hour aside. It is unimaginable to depict the concept I had given this aggressive speech which led to riots. One was making me into a foul man, and the opposite was a really calming assertion.”
BBC apology, no plans to rebroadcast
BBC Chair Samir Shah despatched a private apology on Thursday to the White Home and informed lawmakers the edit was “an error of judgement.”
The next day, British tradition minister Lisa Nandy mentioned the apology was “proper and needed.”
The broadcaster mentioned it had no plans to rebroadcast the documentary and was investigating recent allegations about modifying practices that included the speech on one other programme, “Newsnight.”
Largest disaster in a long time
The dispute has escalated into the broadcaster’s most critical disaster in a long time. Its director normal Tim Davie and head of stories Deborah Turness give up this week over the controversy amid allegations of bias and modifying failures.
Starmer informed parliament on Wednesday he supported a “sturdy and unbiased BBC” however mentioned the broadcaster should “get its home so as.”
“Some would quite the BBC did not exist. A few of them are sitting up there,” he mentioned, pointing to opposition Conservative lawmakers.
“I am not one in all them. In an age of disinformation, the argument for an neutral British information service is stronger than ever.”
The BBC, based in 1922 and funded primarily by a obligatory licence price, faces scrutiny over whether or not public cash could possibly be used to settle Trump’s declare.
Former media minister John Whittingdale mentioned there could be “actual anger” if licence payers’ cash lined damages.