U.S. Supreme Courtroom Police stand behind safety boundaries in entrance of the Courtroom constructing, which is obscured in development scaffolding, on the primary day of the Courtroom’s new time period on October 06, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla | Getty Pictures
A federal appeals court docket in Boston, for a second time, late Sunday flatly rejected a request by the Trump administration to dam a decrease court docket decide’s order that it pay 42 million People their full SNAP advantages throughout the authorities shutdown.
However the decide’s order stays paused because of a previous Supreme Courtroom ruling till no less than Tuesday evening.
That offers the administration time to return to the Supreme Courtroom and ask for a everlasting keep of the order pending its attraction of the case.
The ruling Sunday by a three-judge panel of the first Circuit Courtroom of Appeals got here a day after the U.S. Division of Agriculture threatened states which have issued full advantages since Friday with monetary penalties if they don’t “undo” these funds.
And it got here hours after the Senate narrowly handed step one of a bipartisan deal that may reopen the federal government inside days, and totally fund the Supplemental Diet Help Program by way of subsequent September.
“In reviewing the district court docket’s balancing of the equities, we additionally can not ignore the actual occasions previous this litigation,” wrote Circuit Courtroom Decide Julie Rikelman within the panel’s resolution Sunday. “Because the district court docket discovered, ‘this can be a drawback that might have been averted.'”
“The document right here reveals that the federal government sat on its palms for practically a month, unprepared to make partial funds, whereas individuals who depend on SNAP acquired no advantages every week into November and counting,” Rikelman wrote.
“In gentle of those distinctive details, we can not conclude that the district court docket abused its discretion in requiring full fee of November SNAP advantages to effectuate the October 31 [temporary restraining order after the government had failed to comply with it.”
The Trump administration on Oct. 24 broke decades of precedent when it said it would not pay SNAP benefits in November because Congress had not appropriated money for the program, or any other government program, past the date the shutdown began, Oct. 1. Past administrations had paid SNAP benefits in full during other shutdowns.
The administration rejected the idea of the remaining $4.6 billion in a contingency fund that Congress had specifically allocated to backstop SNAP.
A group of plaintiffs, comprised of nonprofits, local governments, a union, and a food retailer, sued the administration in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island seeking a judicial order forcing the administration to use the contingency fund and other pools of money to fully fund SNAP benefits.
Judge Jack McConnell, who is overseeing the case, ordered the administration to make at least partial benefits as soon as possible by tapping the contingency fund, and to investigate if other money could be used.
McConnell on Thursday ordered that the administration pay full benefits, days after the administration told him it would pay only partial benefits — but that it would take some time to do so — and told him that it had ruled out using so-called Section 32 funds.
McConnell ordered that the administration use Section 32 funds to make up the difference between the 65% of benefits the administration planned to pay by using the contingency fund and the full value of the benefits. SNAP benefits cost about $8 billion each month.
The administration then asked the 1st Circuit for a temporary stay of McConnell’s order on an emergency basis, which the appeals court rejected on Friday.
But the appeals court at the same time also said it was still considering the “government’s motion for a stay pending appeal [of McConnell’s order] … and we intend to situation a call on that movement as shortly as doable.”
On Friday evening, Supreme Courtroom Ketanji Brown Jackson, performing on a request by the administration, paused McConnell’s order from taking impact and instructed the first Circuit to shortly rule on the request for the keep pending attraction.
Jackson’s order paused for 48 hours any ruling by the first Circuit from taking impact.