Former India all-rounder Irfan Pathan has addressed hypothesis about his removing from the IPL 2025 broadcast group, revealing that it was Hardik Pandya, not Virat Kohli or Rohit Sharma, who had issues about his on-air criticism. Talking in an interview with The Lallantop, Pathan clarified the state of affairs and mentioned his previous help for Pandya whereas defending his position as a broadcaster.Pathan defined his strategy to cricket commentary and the need of constructive criticism in broadcasting.“If I am criticising you in 7 matches out of 14, I am nonetheless being lenient. That’s our job as broadcaster,” Pathan said within the interview.The previous cricketer emphasised that there was no private animosity between him and Pandya, highlighting his historical past of supporting cricketers from Baroda.“There isn’t any rivalry. All of the Baroda gamers who’ve come after me — Deepak Hooda, Krunal Pandya or Hardik Pandya — none of them can say that Irfan-Yusuf didn’t assist them,” Pathan shared.Pathan recalled a major incident from 2012 when he had really useful a younger Hardik Pandya to Sunrisers Hyderabad, demonstrating his early recognition of Pandya’s potential.
Ballot
Do you help Irfan Pathan’s strategy to constructive criticism in cricket commentary?
He revealed that VVS Laxman later acknowledged lacking a possibility by not following his advice. “VVS Laxman admitted on Star Sports activities, that he was at fault for not listening to me, and never selecting Hardik in 2012. If he had picked him then, Hardik would have performed for Hyderabad,” Pathan disclosed.The previous all-rounder additionally talked about his help for Pandya throughout difficult instances, significantly when the participant confronted backlash from Mumbai Indians followers following Rohit Sharma’s removing from captaincy earlier than IPL 2024.Pathan defended his stance on cricket criticism whereas sustaining that it ought to stay skilled and never private.“There’s nothing fallacious in criticising the participant, should you play, it’s a must to undergo that. It occurred with Sunil Gavaskar, the nice Sachin Tendulkar… they by no means made anybody really feel, they have been larger than the sport. However I am in opposition to the derogatory phrases used in opposition to Pandya,” he defined.Pathan’s feedback make clear the complicated relationship between cricket broadcasters and gamers, highlighting the steadiness between skilled criticism and private respect in sports activities commentary.The revelation about his removing from the IPL broadcast group and the following clarification gives perception into the behind-the-scenes dynamics of cricket broadcasting and participant relationships.