A normal view of the SEBI (Securities and Change Board of India) constructing is seen within the enterprise district of Mumbai, India, on July 1, 2025.
Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Photos
The Securities Change Board of India (SEBI) has quickly barred Jane Avenue Group from accessing India’s securities market, after it accused the U.S. agency of widespread market manipulation.
In line with an interim order posted on the regulator’s web site on Thursday, Jane Avenue’s “entities are restrained from accessing the securities market and are additional prohibited from shopping for, promoting or in any other case dealing in securities, straight or not directly.”
SEBI additionally issued an interim order to freeze over 48.4 billion Indian rupees ($566.3 million) from Jane Avenue in alleged unlawful good points. It additional acknowledged that banks have been directed to make sure that “no debits are made, with out permission of SEBI,” for accounts held by Jane Avenue’s entities both collectively or individually.
Jane Avenue disputed the findings of SEBI’s interim order and stated it would additional have interaction with the regulator, in response to queries from CNBC. A Jane Avenue spokesperson added that the agency “is dedicated to working in compliance with all rules within the areas we function around the globe.”
“With out any believable financial rationale”
The agency allegedly used varied methods to artificially affect India’s benchmark Nifty 50 index — which tracks the nation’s prime 50 corporations — and revenue from considerably bigger positions in index choices.
In line with SEBI’s 105-page interim order, Jane Avenue would aggressively purchase giant quantities of shares and futures which might be a part of the BANKNIFTY index, which tracks the efficiency of India’s banking sector, early within the buying and selling day. The agency would then place giant bets that the index would decline later within the day.
Jane Avenue would then dump the positions it had purchased earlier, dragging the index decrease and making their earlier bets within the choices market way more worthwhile.
Whereas Jane Avenue would incur some losses, SEBI contended that it was a part of a “deliberate technique to govern indices to the benefit of the buying and selling and positions,” and the losses have been offset by the agency’s a lot bigger and worthwhile choices commerce.
Whereas these actions weren’t a breach of any regulation, SEBI stated that the “depth and sheer scale” of their intervention, and the fast reversal of their trades “with out any believable financial rationale, aside from the concurrent exercise in and affect on their positions within the BANKNIFTY index choices markets,” was manipulative.
SEBI stated that repeated situations of manipulative buying and selling continued even after an “express advisory” was issued to the agency in February 2025 by the Nationwide Inventory Change of India.
“Such egregious behaviour, in clear disregard/ defiance of the express advisory issued to them by NSE in February 2025, amply demonstrates that not like the overwhelming majority of International Portfolio Buyers and different market contributors, [Jane Street] Group will not be a very good religion actor that may be, or deserves to be, trusted,” the regulator stated.
“The integrity of the market, and the religion of tens of millions of small traders and merchants, can not be held hostage to the machinations of such an untrustworthy actor,” SEBI added.
SEBI’s transfer comes as a number of different world buying and selling corporations, from Citadel Securities and IMC Buying and selling to Millennium and Optiver, have been stepping up their presence in India, to experience on its booming derivatives markets.
The Indian regulator had beforehand expressed issues over practices equivalent to algorithmic buying and selling, which SEBI stated in a September 2024 report allowed proprietary merchants and international portfolio traders to make 610 billion Indian rupees in earnings in FY 2024, whereas retail traders and different market contributors misplaced the identical quantity throughout that interval.
— CNBC’s Aparajita Saxena contributed to this report