In a lawsuit filed on Friday in federal court docket in Boston, Harvard stated the federal government’s motion violates the First Modification and could have an “fast and devastating impact for Harvard and greater than 7,000 visa holders.”
The Harvard College on Friday sued the Trump administration over ban on enrolling overseas college students. In a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court docket in Boston, Harvard stated the federal government’s motion violates the First Modification and could have an “mmediate and devastating impact for Harvard and greater than 7,000 visa holders.”
“With the stroke of a pen, the federal government has sought to erase 1 / 4 of Harvard’s scholar physique, worldwide college students who contribute considerably to the College and its mission,” Harvard stated in its swimsuit.
The varsity stated it plans to file for a brief restraining order to dam the Division of Homeland Safety from finishing up the transfer. The Ivy League faculty calls the ban unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White Home’s political calls for.
The varsity stated it plans to file for a brief restraining order to dam the Division of Homeland Safety from finishing up the transfer.
Harvard enrols virtually 6,800 overseas college students at its campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Most are graduate college students and so they come from greater than 100 international locations.
The division introduced the motion Thursday, accusing Harvard of making an unsafe campus atmosphere by permitting “anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators” to assault Jewish college students on campus.
It additionally accused Harvard of coordinating with the Chinese language Communist Occasion, contending the varsity had hosted and educated members of a Chinese language paramilitary group as not too long ago as 2024.
Harvard President Alan Garber earlier this month stated the college has made adjustments to its governance over the previous 12 months and a half, together with a broad technique to fight antisemitism. He stated Harvard wouldn’t budge on its “core, legally-protected ideas” over fears of retaliation.