Police have now categorized the case as false and are taking authorized motion underneath the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) towards each the girl and her father for deceptive authorities and losing public assets.
What was initially believed to be a stunning acid assault on a Delhi College pupil has now been revealed as a meticulously deliberate hoax. In a dramatic twist, Delhi Police have arrested Aqeel Khan, the daddy of the alleged sufferer, for masterminding the faux acid assault in a bid to falsely implicate three males — Jitendra, Ishan, and Arman — in a fabricated case. What started as a distressing story of gender-based violence that sparked public outrage has now unraveled right into a story of deceit and conspiracy, exposing how a father and daughter plotted to stage an assault and mislead each the police and the general public.
Father confesses to planning faux assault
Throughout interrogation, Aqeel Khan made a sensational confession, admitting that he had deliberate the complete faux acid assault along with his daughter to falsely implicate Jitendra, Ishan, and Arman — three males towards whom he harboured private grudges.
In an enormous admission, he stated that his daughter was carrying a rest room cleaner from house, which she poured on her palms to simulate acid burns and make the incident seem actual.
Police sources revealed that Khan’s motive stemmed from a sexual harassment and blackmail grievance filed by Jitendra’s spouse towards him simply two days earlier than the alleged assault. Fearing authorized hassle and public shame, Khan determined to divert consideration by fabricating an acid assault case that will body Jitendra and his associates.
The alleged acid assault that sparked outrage
On October 26, 2025, a 20-year-old Delhi College BCom pupil claimed she was attacked with acid close to Laxmi Bai Faculty in Ashok Vihar whereas on her strategy to class.
She alleged that Jitendra, who had been stalking her, alongside along with his pals Ishan and Arman, hurled acid at her from a motorbike. The lady stated she tried to defend her face and sustained burns on her palms.
The alleged assault sparked huge outrage throughout social media and prompted a swift police response.
Investigation reveals main inconsistencies
Nonetheless, because the Delhi Police Crime Department started probing the case, obvious inconsistencies emerged within the girl’s model.
CCTV footage, name knowledge data (CDRs), and eyewitness statements contradicted her claims. Investigators discovered that Jitendra was in Karol Bagh on the time of the alleged assault, over 10 km from the crime scene. His cellular location and CCTV footage confirmed his alibi, and his motorbike, allegedly used within the assault, was parked in Karol Bagh.
In the meantime, Ishan and Arman had been traced to Agra, the place they had been with their mom, Shabnam, additional discrediting the allegations.
CCTV footage and forensic proof expose the lie
CCTV footage from Mukundpur revealed that the girl had left house along with her brother on a scooter however obtained off close to Ashok Vihar, about 200 metres from her faculty, and took an e-rickshaw — a element she omitted in her assertion.
Police found that she had carried a bottle of bathroom cleaner from house and poured it on her personal palms to imitate acid accidents. Forensic groups discovered no traces of acid on the scene, and medical doctors at RML Hospital confirmed the burns had been superficial, per a gentle family corrosive, not industrial acid.
Father’s motive: Retaliation and diversion
Police stated Khan’s motive was revenge and distraction. After Jitendra’s spouse accused him of sexual exploitation whereas working at his manufacturing unit (2021–2024), Khan allegedly plotted the faux acid assault to divert consideration from the harassment case and body Jitendra’s household.
Authorized motion underneath Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Following the confession and forensic evaluation confirming no acid assault occurred, Delhi Police have booked each the girl and her father underneath the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for submitting a false FIR, fabricating proof, and deceptive investigators.
A senior Delhi Police officer stated, “The proof clearly proves that no acid assault occurred. The daddy’s admission and the medical findings expose a deliberate try and misuse public outrage and waste police assets.”
A fabricated case that shook public belief
What started as a name for justice for an alleged acid assault survivor has became a narrative of deceit and manipulation. The faux case not solely diverted public assets but in addition undermined the struggles of actual acid assault survivors, elevating considerations over how rapidly misinformation spreads.
As Delhi Police proceed with authorized motion, the case stands as a stark reminder of the injury false narratives can inflict on public belief and real victims of violence.
Additionally learn: