Bilawal Bhutto reiterates empty struggle rhetoric: ‘If India builds dams, there will probably be struggle…’


Pakistani leaders Bilawal Bhutto and Asim Munir have sparked outrage with struggle and nuclear threats over the Indus River, misrepresenting India’s authorized treaty rights and escalating regional tensions.

New Delhi:

Former Pakistani Overseas Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has stirred recent controversy with a barrage of provocative statements directed at India, warning that the development of dams on the Indus River system by India may result in struggle. The feedback, extensively seen as inflammatory and missing diplomatic maturity, come amid continued Pakistani makes an attempt to politicise the Indus Waters Treaty, a decades-old settlement India has constantly upheld.

In a fiery speech to supporters, Bhutto accused the Modi authorities of launching a “historic assault” on the Indus River, calling it not only a water supply however a logo of Pakistan’s heritage. “When Modi talks about constructing dams, he’s attacking our historical past and our compassion,” Bhutto claimed, equating authorized hydroelectric improvement with cultural warfare.

He additional alleged that India’s actions threatened Pakistan’s solely water useful resource and posed international implications. “We’ve informed the world how Modi is attacking the Indus,” he mentioned, claiming he had raised the problem within the US and Europe, although no worldwide physique has taken a place aligning with Bhutto’s alarmist narrative.

Regardless of portraying himself as a proponent of peace, Bhutto issued clear threats: “If India builds dams, there will probably be “he warned, suggesting that Pakistan’s provinces had been able to rise towards any Indian transfer associated to the river. Sarcastically, these remarks got here at the same time as he accused India of selling battle.

He added, “If you concentrate on this type of assault like (Operation) Sindoor, then individuals from each province of Pakistan are able to confront you. And it is a struggle you’ll undoubtedly lose.” In additional remarks, he additionally known as India’s Indus Waters Treaty transfer the “largest assault” on the Sindhu River. “Folks of Sindh increase their voices and attain the bottom to save lots of Sindhu (river) when such an assault is launched,” he mentioned.

The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960 and brokered by the World Financial institution, grants India full rights over the jap rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) and restricted use of the western rivers (Indus, Chenab, Jhelum) for non-consumptive functions resembling hydroelectricity. India has adhered to those phrases, constructing initiatives inside treaty limits and notifying Pakistan transparently.

Earlier, Pakistan Military Chief Area Marshal Asim Munir has sparked international concern with nuclear threats made throughout his go to to Tampa, Florida, the place he informed members of the Pakistani diaspora that Pakistan would use nuclear weapons if it confronted an existential menace from India, reportedly stating, “We’re a nuclear nation. If we predict we’re taking place, we’ll take half the world down with us.” He additionally threatened Indian infrastructure if water circulation to Pakistan was blocked.

This alarming rhetoric, made throughout Munir’s second US go to in two months, prompted a pointy response from India’s Ministry of Exterior Affairs (MEA), which condemned Pakistan’s nuclear posturing as its ‘stock-in-trade’ and cited the assertion as additional proof of the dearth of credible command and management over nuclear belongings in Pakistan. The MEA added that such threats constructed from the territory of a pleasant nation just like the US had been regrettable and reaffirmed that India wouldn’t succumb to nuclear blackmail.

In the meantime, Islamabad reiterated its dedication to the Indus Waters Treaty and urged India to renew cooperation, which New Delhi had suspended following a terrorist assault in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam, linking Pakistan’s threats and terror ties as central to the breakdown in belief.