Finisher who? Raipur loss highlights India’s obtrusive ODI weak point


India arrived in Raipur with a way of rising rhythm, carried by the glow of Virat Kohli’s second successive century and Ruturaj Gaikwad’s maiden ODI hundred. Underneath the intense floodlights and in entrance of 60,000 spectators, the scoreboard learn 358 for five, a complete that felt full, loud and imposing. The environment steered an evening that ought to belong to India. However cricket, because it typically does in India’s closing overs, posed a query the workforce nonetheless can not reply. By the point the innings closed, that seemingly commanding whole felt like a promise unkept.

Dew softened the ball and the bowlers in equal measure.nevertheless it couldn’t blur the reality India have lived with for years: they don’t have a finisher they belief. Aiden Markram’s century carried assurance, Matthew Breetzke introduced urgency within the center overs, and Dewald Brevis performed with the liberty of somebody unburdened by stress. South Africa’s chase unfolded not with chaos however with conviction, leveling the collection and exposing India’s most acquainted flaw as soon as once more.

Brevis’ 54 off 34 balls, stuffed with crisp hitting and unruffled composure, pushed South Africa forward. Even after his dismissal with 70 wanted off 57 balls, the guests retained readability. India sensed a gap when Breetzke and Marco Jansen fell in fast succession, and pressure rose when Tony de Zorzi limped off with a hamstring subject. For a second, Raipur held its breath. However Corbin Bosch arrived with function, Keshav Maharaj steadied the chase, and collectively they restored the calm India by no means discovered with the bat. With 27 required off 30 balls, South Africa barely blinked. India, in the meantime, had been left to reckon with the runs they left behind within the closing 10 overs.

A RECURRING PATTERN

This collection has adopted a strikingly comparable script. India lose the toss, Kohli scores 100, and the workforce strikes previous or near 350. Then the dew arrives, the spinners lose management of the ball, and the match tilts decisively. What needs to be a tactical contest turns into a wrestle towards slippery circumstances.

Across the 25-over mark in every chase, the ball has resembled a bar of moist cleaning soap. On flat, unresponsive pitches beneath lights, bowlers get nothing in return and are lowered to ready for errors quite than forcing them. In Ranchi, South Africa made sufficient errors to fall 17 quick. In Raipur, needing 359, they stored their self-discipline and received with 4 balls to spare.

Their deeper batting line-up proved telling. As soon as Markram compiled a disciplined 98-ball 110, contributions from Temba Bavuma (46), Breetzke (68) and Brevis (54) stored the chase regular. As batting grew to become simpler with the dew, South Africa marched in the direction of the goal with confidence. Requiring round 100 from the final 12 overs, they reached it with out panic.

India could really feel the toss formed their night, however that alone doesn’t clarify the gaps in their very own innings.

These lacking 20 to 30 runs, those robust sides collected instinctively, grew to become the lingering remorse. Kohli and Gaikwad had given India an ideal launchpad, and for some time the innings appeared destined for a complete within the 370 to 400 vary as their 195-run stand powered the hosts in the direction of dominance. India had been 284 for 3 within the thirty ninth over, however the innings stalled on the very stage the place acceleration was wanted most, producing solely 74 runs within the closing 11 overs.

At 257 for two within the thirty sixth over, India managed the night time. By 289 for five within the forty first, the momentum had drained away. Washington Sundar’s continued struggles once more raised questions on what function he genuinely fulfills with the bat. KL Rahul, now the fulcrum of India’s ODI center order, held the innings along with one other composed effort. His unbeaten 66 felt like somebody was holding the construction from collapsing round him. Jadeja’s 24 off 27 introduced steadiness however supplied no elevate in time. The stand prevented a collapse however by no means imposed stress on South Africa, leaving India wanting the whole the platform demanded.

Jadeja supplied nothing to elevate the tempo within the loss of life overs (Courtesy: PTI)

When the innings closed at 358, the bottom sensed it may have, and may have, been larger. Rahul’s two fours and a six within the closing over had been strokes of resistance quite than dominance. The dew had not even arrived but.

South Africa, in distinction, made their closing section depend. Brevis and Breetzke ensured momentum by means of the center overs; India allowed theirs to stall. When the chase tightened, South Africa had a number of batsmen who may elevate the tempo. India depended solely on Rahul. The ultimate 5 overs once more underlined the hole, with Sundar’s 1 off 8, Jadeja unable to discover a boundary possibility, and a complete that lacked the punch required in trendy ODI cricket.

Each Kohli and Gaikwad fell quickly after their a whole bunch, nevertheless it was Rahul who shouldered nearly all of the late-overs hitting within the absence of a delegated finisher with Hardik Pandya injured.

With Axar Patel rested, India turned to Jadeja and Sundar for late-overs impetus. As a substitute, Sundar was dismissed for 1 off 8 deliveries and Jadeja managed solely 24 off 27. Their lack of ability to speed up price India dearly, because the workforce mustered simply 41 runs within the final 5 overs regardless of Rahul’s 66 off 43.

Social media rapidly crammed with questions on India’s lack of ending energy in Raipur. Rahul acknowledged it plainly: “We may have executed higher how we will get the additional 20 to 25 runs to present bowlers a cushion with the moist ball.” A quiet admission, however a telling one.

WHO CAN BE THE FINISHER?

India’s seek for a finisher has stretched throughout years, tournaments and management cycles. The absence was obtrusive within the 2023 World Cup closing, when the innings stalled on the very second it wanted boldness. It stays obtrusive now. KL Rahul has been India’s finest loss of life overs batter since 2023, scoring 424 runs at a strike charge of 142.76, however he isn’t constructed for the finisher’s job.

  • David Miller: 464 runs, SR 168.11
  • Charith Asalanka: 438 runs, SR 147.97
  • KL Rahul: 424 runs, SR 142.76
  • Glenn Phillips: 413 runs, SR 149.63

His function is to anchor, take in stress and information the innings, to not be the designated enforcer on the finish. Asking him to do each weakens the stability of India’s batting. As soon as Shubman Gill and Shreyas Iyer return to the XI, Rahul should slot again at No. 5, the place he has been at his best and the place his recreation naturally belongs.

India should not have a participant who mirrors Miller’s energy, Asalanka’s vary or Phillips’ unpredictability. Hardik Pandya as soon as supplied that answer, however recurring accidents have turned him from a certainty right into a query mark. His absence within the 2023 ODI World Cup, particularly on 19 November in Ahmedabad, underlined the void. India lacked a single batsman able to injecting tempo on the loss of life of a closing that slipped away meekly.

India should not attempt to burden KL Rahul with the finisher’s function (Courtesy: PTI)

Waiting for 2027, India wants to start constructing now. Rinku Singh’s capacity to strike from ball one, his calm beneath stress and his willingness to assemble an innings quite than merely detonate on the finish make him a uncommon trendy hitter able to bridging India’s late overs hole. He mustn’t merely be examined however developed with a transparent function in thoughts.

Riyan Parag is another choice the workforce administration can not overlook. His all-round development within the India A setup, together with the arrogance to bowl 3 to five overs when wanted and his improved studying of match conditions, locations him forward of Sundar within the present hierarchy. Sundar’s function stays undefined, his influence unsure and his batting too tentative for a place requiring intuition and aggression. Axar Patel gives extra consistency, however paired with Jadeja, their ability units overlap too intently. Parag brings one thing totally different: intent, off spin and fearless vary hitting.

The uncomfortable reality is that India won’t win the 2027 World Cup with their present ending choices. Suryakumar Yadav and Rahul had been blamed after the 2023 closing, however Jadeja too was quiet in that title decider. Raipur repeated the sample. India hold lacking 400, and within the trendy ODI panorama, particularly on excessive scoring surfaces with dew, these lacking runs may be deadly.

A brand new ending blueprint should emerge, constructed round energy hitters like Rinku Singh, Jitesh Sharma, Hardik Pandya when match and even perhaps Shivam Dube. Rahul should keep at No. 5, not be stretched skinny as a component time finisher. India wants certainty on the loss of life, not improvisation.

– ends

Revealed On:

Dec 4, 2025