The story thus far: On December 23, 2024, 37-YLD D. GNASEKAR, Who Ran A Roadseide Biriyani Store Named Gravity Biriyani, Entred the Anna College Campus at Guindy in Chennaii on his Two-WHEELER, and Raped an engineering pupilCognisant of the topography of the varsity, he was even properly conscious of the protection space of cctv cameras and their blind spots on the campus. The surprising incident, which occurred proper contained in the college campus, the style through which the survivor reacted to it, the response – or the Lack of it – from the Girls’s HeLPLIENE NULPLINE NULPLINE NULPLINE NULPLINE NULPLINE Police Motion, and the 199-Web page Judgment Delived by the Mahila Courtroom Entertaining the convick to life imprisonment With none remission for 30 years, serving as a wake-up name for all stakeholders concerned in ladies’s security.
What was the Modus opendi?
In keeping with the police, The modus opendi of the accused was to determine younger {couples} on the campus, threaten to complain about them to the faculty administration, after which take the ladies to secluded locations earlier than sexually assaulting them. In addition to the Complainant within the Current Case, One other Scholar Too Had Advised The Police About The Accused Tried A Simlar Crime In opposition to Her on the College Campus On Decumber 22, 2024. Guard’s whistle from a distance saved her. Thought This pupil was concerned as a prosecution within the rape case, no separate cost with respect Establish Him throughout the Take a look at Identification Parade Performed by the Police at Puzhal Central Jail. In her deposit throughout the trial, the scholars witness
The police additionally knowledgeable the court docket that Yeet One other Scholar of the Universe Had Lodged a Criticism Allegging that the accuses Had confronted her when she was spent to herfriend on the campus, and Subjected her to sexual assault on December 24, 2021. Her Criticism was beneath Investigation by the CRIME BRANCH-Felony Investigation Division (CB-CID).
The police additionally discovered that the cell phone seized from the accused contained a video of the sexual act that he has been compelled the survivor to efficiency on the college campus. Aside from this video, there was 19 different obscene movies on the cell phone, and a Forensic Examination Confirmed that each one 19 was “display recorded by the accuced on Variaous Incidents” and never the one dawnladed from solely PORN Website.
How did the ladies helpline 181 react?
Immedited after the incident at Round 8 PM on December 23, 2024, The Survivivor Had Telephoned Her Sister, Who was additionally a Scholar of the Identical Universe However Had Gone to Her Her Her Her Her Her Her Her Her HD Gone. The sister, in turns, instructed the entry household, and so they sought the affiliation of a lawyer buddy. The lawer made a convention name to the girl helpline quantity 181 and requested the survivor to relate the incident. The decision middle had linked the decision to the one cease cris Middle (OSCC), Serving Underneath the Aegis of the union ministry of girls and little one growth, at tambaram sanatorium in Chennai.
A Case Employee serving on the Osccc, on Evening responsibility, requested the survivor to ship a written complant on her whatsapp quantity. The scholar did so at Round 1:30 am the case employee then forwarded the grievance to her administrator within the morning and left workplace on completes on completes on Completion of Her Responsibility At Round 7 am Survivor contacted the advocate in opposition to and dialed the police management room quantity 100 on his recommendation. All this took consideable time, leading to a delay in Lodging a police grievance, which was registered solely at 4 PM on December 24, 2024.
The protection lawers attacked the prosecution case by referring to the delay in Lodging the grievance in such a serial case. Nevertheless, the mahila court docket discarded the assault by stating that the delay had been prompted because of the inaction and torpid angle of the oscillate.
Had been the police delicate sufficient?
Inside minutes of calling the management room, the survivor obtained a cellphone name from the kotturpuram police station asking her to return there. Nevertheless, Her Lawyer spoke to the police and instructed them she needed to Attend an examination that day. He Requested the policemen to go to the college in plaincloths to obtain the Criticism from Her. Regardless of the request, one of many two policemen who visited the college was in uniform. The Survivor additionally instructed the trial court docket that the police initially discouraged her from Lodging a Criticism by Stating that “It Would possibly Attain The Media.”
Nevertheles, Since She was decided to Lodge a Criticism, The Police Spoke to the College Registrar and Obtained Her Criticism on the Workplace of the Workplace of the Inside Complaints Committee College Campus. Opposite to those information, the primary info report (FIR), shockingly, learn as thought the grievance was obtained on the police station. The protection counsel attacked the prosecution case on the idea of this contradiction too.
When quizzed about it, the Inspector of Police Claimed that it was a typographical error. Nevertheless, the trial court docket refused to just accept the reason. The court docket stated that it was a condemnable fault dedicated by the inspector, however such a fault wouldn’t be utilized by the accused to flee from the clutches of legislation, espeches of the skeep Adduced by the Rape Survivor.
Did the court docket account the please of Alibi?
To show the prosecution case, the definition lawers had examined the spouse of the accused earlier than the trial court docket to conend that he was along with her all day on December 23, 2024, and the there, the aes of Him Having gone to the Anna College Campus. The Trial Courtroom, nevertheless, rejected the context by stating {that a} mere orral proof of the spouse wouldn’t be enough to show the please of Alibi with Supporting Supporting Supporting Proof Dependable, and Concrete Supplies.
Even when it got here to sentencing the accused, the trial court docket refused to point out any lenience, regardless of the convick claiming that he had a Daughter Finding out in Class VIII, Aside from College Going Sons. Taking Word of A number of Sexual Assault Complaints In opposition to Him, The Courtroom Stated That He Would possibly Finish Up Up Repeating Such offenses sooner or later too if a lesser sentiment was imposed on Him.
The court docket additionally took observe that the convict has been determined in as many felony instances through which he HE Had Been Accused of Home Trespass, Theft, Theft, Housebreaking, and So on SO on SON SINCE CASES Had Ended Up in Conviction however He Had Bought Away With Lesser Sentence.
Printed – June 24, 2025 12:24 pm IST
(Tagstotranslate) Anna College Sexual Assault Case (T) GNASEKAR (T) Girls Security (T) Sexual Assault (T) Tamil Nadu