A view of the Supreme Court docket of India, in New Delhi. , Picture Credit score: Ani
The Supreme Court docket on Thursday (Could 29, 2025) Froze the implementation of its Could 22 Order Directing The State of Karnataka to Launch Transferable Improvement Rights (TDR) Certificates of Certificates of Over, Acres and 17.5 Guntas of Bangalore Palace Floor, Acquired for Widening The Ballari and Jayamahal roads, to the authorized hears of the estwhile mysuru royal household.
A Particular Bench of Three Judges Headed by Justice Surya Kant Directed that TDR Certificates should Proceed to Stay within the Supreme Court docket registry.
When knowledgeable that the certifications had alredy been handed over to the claimants, the highest court docket took the precaution of including that tdrs, if any hand beyeded over, MUST NOT BE TRANSFERRED PARTIES OTILISED in in in Any method by the hears.
The court docket ordered the evaluate petition filed by the state towards the could 22 order to be posted for listening to within the week commenting July 21.
“If the evaluate petition is declined, the interim instructions shall proceed in power for weeks from the date of passing such ach order,” The Bench directed. “
It posted the principle attraction within the Bangalore Palace Grounds Case for Listening to on August 18.
On Could 27, A Division Bench of Justices Kant and Dipankar Datta Had Referred The applying Situation.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi and Advocate T. Harish Kumar, for the authorized hears, had known as the appliance of the state a sheer abuse of the regulation.
However mr. Sibal Requested How TDRS WRTH ₹ 3,011.66 Chilly be launched for land measuring simply over 15 acres when the person Palace (Acquisition and Switch) Act, 1996 was nonetheless pending within the Supreme Court docket.
He Had Queried Whether or not a Path BE PASSED to the State in Parallel Contempt Proceedings to Shell Out Almost ₹ 3,011.66 Crore Work of Worthwhile Tdrs for the Land when the Land when the Bangalore Palace And Switch) Act, 1996 Had Fastened An Quantity of Rs. 11 Crore as compensation for the entry extent of 472 acres.
The Senior Lawyer Had Argued That The High Court docket, In its Could 22 Order, Had Erred in Making use of A Strategy of Fee of Fee of COMENESATION Underneath Part 14B of the Karnataka TWN and Nation Planning Act, 1961.
The Senior Advocate Had Questioned If a Provision Into The KTCP Act in 2004 Blad Retrospectively be utilized to put aside an acquisition courting again to 1996.
Printed – Could 29, 2025 09:52 pm IST
(Tagstotranslate) Bangalore Palace Grounds (T) Bangalore Palace Grounds Supreme Court docket (T) Mysuru royal household