New Delhi: Just a few days earlier than Russian President Vladimir Putin’s scheduled arrival in India, an issue erupted over a joint article written by German and French ambassadors together with the British excessive commissioner. Revealed in The Instances of India on December 1, the piece has not gone down properly in diplomatic circles, with a number of former envoys saying the timing couldn’t have been extra provocative.
Titled ‘The world desires the Ukraine battle to finish, however Russia doesn’t appear severe about peace’, the op-ed, which was authored by German Ambassador Philipp Ackermann, French Ambassador Thierry Mathou and British Excessive Commissioner Lindy Cameron, instantly caught consideration.
The opening strains itself set tone of the article. The three diplomats wrote that for greater than three years, the folks of Ukraine have defended their nation with braveness and deep resolve.
“Russia can finish this battle instantly by withdrawing its forces and stopping its unlawful aggression, or on the very least by agreeing to a ceasefire, coming into negotiations and bringing the preventing to a detailed,” they wrote.
They added, “However in 2025, Russian assaults have intensified, and since peace talks started, President Putin has launched 22 of the biggest strikes of your complete battle.”
All through their piece, Russia was repeatedly described because the principal driver of the persevering with battle. Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, they highlighted a press release he had made earlier, “The world agrees that the battle should cease. India has additionally made this clear. Prime Minister Modi has stated that no resolution might be discovered on the battlefield.”
In the meantime, India has expressed displeasure over the joint op-ed, with the Ministry of Exterior Affairs terming it “uncommon” and “not acceptable”.
‘Not acceptable to provide India public recommendation on relations wirh one other nation’, say MEA officers after envoys of U.Okay., France and Germany writer anti-Putin article,simply 3 days earlier than Russian President arrives in Delhi for State go to. @janusmyth studieshttps://t.co/HWkNIrnLDL
— Suhasini Haidar (@suhasinih) December 3, 2025
Query On Timing, Intent
With out leaving any room for ambiguity, Kanwal Sibal, who has served because the international secretary and ambassador to Russia, bluntly cricised the article and described it as a “breach of diplomatic norms” and a “diplomatic insult to India”.
“This vicious article in opposition to Russia simply earlier than Putin’s state go to to India breaches diplomatic norms, is a diplomatic insult to India because it questions India’s shut ties with a really pleasant third nation,” he wrote on X (previously Twitter).
He went on to jot down, “It’s interference in our inner affairs as the aim is to gasoline anti- Russian sentiments in pro- European circles in India and query the morality of our ties with Russia. The envoys of those three international locations are free to make their views recognized to the MEA in an official demarche however are usually not supposed to have interaction in public grandstanding with an overt propagandist intent.”
He didn’t spare the newspaper both. He stated that it was “completely flawed of TOI to simply accept to publish this text. That is consciously doing dis-service to our diplomacy and nationwide curiosity. MEA ought to categorical its displeasure publicly at this violation of diplomatic norms by the three envoys”.
This vicious article in opposition to Russia simply earlier than Putin’s state go to to India breaches diplomatic norms, is a diplomatic insult to India because it questions India’s shut ties with a really pleasant third nation.
It’s interference in our inner affairs as the aim is to gasoline… https://t.co/oN5E2iLqT5
— Kanwal Sibal (@KanwalSibal) December 1, 2025
If ToI comes can IE be far behind.
IE as we speak interviews visiting Deputy FM of Poland.
Understanding Poland’s inveterate hatred of Russia , IE asks him how he views Putin’s go to to India and what he anticipated India to convey to Putin.
These questions have been supposed to provide the Polish…
— Kanwal Sibal (@KanwalSibal) December 2, 2025
Sibal additionally expressed displeasure after ANI interviewed the German ambassador throughout the build-up to Putin’s go to.
“It’s obscure why ANI made a particular effort to provide the German Ambassador a platform to voice anti-Russia statements proper earlier than Putin’s go to. The mindset of our press at instances resembles that of a banana republic,” he posted.
He added, “The German Ambassador doesn’t want to inform our leaders what to say to Putin. We oppose the battle in Ukraine, however we additionally know Europe seeks peace solely by means of army energy. The envoy ought to as an alternative be requested why Germany continues to supply weapons and monetary support to Ukraine, and why, regardless of the atrocities dedicated by Nazi Germany in opposition to Russia up to now, it’s once more on a confrontational path with Russia.”
Why ANI expressly sought to provide the German ambassador a possibility to do the same old Russia bashing simply earlier than Putin’s go to is puzzling.
Our press has the mindset of belonging to a banana republic.
German ambassador doesn’t want to inform our leaders what they need to say to… https://t.co/5FgMytVZae
— Kanwal Sibal (@KanwalSibal) December 2, 2025
Media Selections Below Scrutiny
The criticism didn’t cease there. Sriymoy Talukdar, a senior editor at Firstpost, argued that the article ought to by no means have appeared in an Indian publication at such a delicate second.
“This text shouldn’t have been revealed in any Indian media outlet on the time of Putin’s go to. It’s a clear try to intrude in India’s international coverage and appears written with the intention of embarrassing India forward of the Russian President’s arrival,” he wrote.
In line with him, “India isn’t a platform for Europe’s ethical rhetoric in opposition to Russia. The article is extraordinarily poor in style and so is the choice by an Indian publication to provide it house.”
With Putin’s go to imminent, the article by British excessive commissioner Lindy Cameron and two others shouldn’t have been revealed in an Indian media outlet.
The article is a transparent try at interference in India’s international coverage, and has been written with an intent to embarrass…
— Sreemoy Talukdar (@sreemoytalukdar) December 1, 2025
His criticism prompted a swift response from Suhasini Haidar, diplomatic affairs editor at The Hindu. “Why is the media being focused right here? It’s for the Ministry of Exterior Affairs to determine whether or not a protocol has been violated or not,” he countered the criticism.
Why blame the media right here? It’s for the MEA to determine whether or not protocol has been violated… https://t.co/v5Qy00889O
— Suhasini Haidar (@suhasinih) December 2, 2025
Russian Ambassador now responds to column by Ambassadors of UK, Germany and France.
Indian media the brand new battleground for “Europe’s battle”. https://t.co/8LvJJ4AyrY
— Suhasini Haidar (@suhasinih) December 3, 2025
‘Not A Protocol Breach, However In Good Style’
Ranjit Rae, former ambassador to Nepal and Vietnam, provided a extra measured view when requested by the BBC whether or not the article amounted to a breach of diplomatic protocol.
“I don’t assume there may be any violation of protocol, however it’s true that when an necessary visitor is arriving, saying such issues proper earlier than the go to doesn’t go down properly. It received’t be thought of in good style. Europe has points with Russia, however Europe’s issues don’t mechanically turn into the world’s issues. Even then, in a democratic nation, there needs to be house to welcome and to criticise,” he stated.
One other diplomat who beforehand served as India’s Ambassador to France, talking to BBC on situation of anonymity, echoed Rae’s sentiment.
“This isn’t a protocol violation, however definitely not in good style. Consider it this fashion: if I have been India’s ambassador in america and Pakistan’s prime minister arrived along with his Military chief, our authorities would need some adverse ambiance round them. We would strive utilizing the native press. If a paper agreed to provide house, we might write one thing. The second query is whether or not, in Putin’s case, Indian media ought to have provided house to European diplomats.”
Geopolitical Sign Behind Putin’s Go to
Strategic affairs knowledgeable Brahma Chellaney believes the timing of Putin’s journey carries a a lot deeper message to the world.
“In a world dividing into rival blocs, President Putin’s December 4-5 go to to New Delhi isn’t an extraordinary diplomatic cease; it’s a highly effective geopolitical sign. This go to may result in necessary agreements, together with new fee channels. It’s essential for efforts to bypass the SWIFT system and scale back the dominance of the U.S. greenback,” he posted on X.
He added, “India has watched how Western insurance policies, by means of sanctions and the weaponisation of monetary instruments past SWIFT, have pushed Russia deeper into China’s embrace. Even then, Putin’s go to, his first because the Ukraine battle started, reveals that Russia nonetheless sees choices past China and doesn’t intend to turn into a ‘junior accomplice’.”
‘Europe’s Issues Are Not World’s Issues’
Chellaney additionally identified that India is sending its personal message. “At a time when the U.S., below Trump’s management, is treating India disrespectfully, New Delhi is neither isolating Russia nor following Western sanctions that prohibit its strategic autonomy. By internet hosting Putin, India is making it clear that it rejects the Western thought of ‘both you’re with us or in opposition to us’ and can select its personal path,” he wrote.
In a world splitting into rival blocs, Putin’s Dec. 4–5 go to to New Delhi is not only one other diplomatic stopover; it’s a highly effective geopolitical assertion. The journey is poised to ship consequential agreements, together with new fee channels designed to bypass the SWIFT system…
— Dr. Brahma Chellaney (@Chellaney) December 2, 2025
This theme has appeared in Indian international coverage discourse earlier than. In June 2022, Exterior Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated at a convention in Bratislava, “Europe has grown up with the mindset that its issues are the world’s issues, however the world’s issues are usually not Europe’s issues.”
Later, Jindal World Regulation College Professor Prabhash Ranjan related Jaishankar’s comment to a historic speech by Jawaharlal Nehru on the United Nations Common Meeting on November 3, 1948.
Nehru had stated, “I’m equally occupied with fixing Europe’s issues. However I additionally need to say that the world extends past Europe. You can not remedy your issues with the idea that Europe’s issues are the world’s foremost issues. The dialog should be holistic. For those who ignore even one a part of the world’s points, you aren’t actually understanding them. I communicate right here as a consultant of Asia, which may be very a lot part of this world.”
Germany’s then Chancellor Olaf Scholz would later cite Jaishankar’s comment throughout the Munich Safety Convention in February 2023, saying, “The Indian international minister has a degree. But it surely is not going to stay solely Europe’s downside if guidelines in worldwide relations are usually not enforced strictly.”