BJP alleges Congress exhibits contempt for Hindu beliefs and traditions

The Bharatiya Janata Celebration (BJP) on Wednesday accused the Congress of harboring “contempt” for Hindu beliefs and Indian cultural traditions, questioning whether or not the social gathering had instructed its Chief Ministers to assault Hindu deities and beliefs, and if it had begun pursuing the “eradication of Sanatana Dharma” agenda.

At a press convention, BJP MP and spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi alleged that Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy had made “derogatory and offensive” feedback about Hindu deities, which had been “unacceptable” and “deeply hurtful to non secular sentiments”. He additionally referred to Mr. Reddy’s earlier remarks purportedly supporting the Muslim group.

“We have now no downside along with your wholehearted help for the Muslim group. However abusing the Hindu gods and goddesses is insupportable,” Mr. Trivedi mentioned, including that no motion was taken towards an AIMIM chief in Telangana for allegedly utilizing an identical “anti-Hindu language”.

The BJP chief additionally accused Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu of claiming “What’s the have to say Radhe-Radhein response to schoolchildren who greeted him with “Radhe-Radhe“. “Why one Congress Chief Minister was insulting Hindu deities, whereas one other appeared to discourage youngsters from utilizing conventional greetings?” Mr. Trivedi requested.

“Considered one of your alliance companions, the DMK, held a structured convention on the Eradication of Sanatana Dharma. It was not a mere assertion, however a well-planned, well-thought-out, tutorial convention. In Hindi, it means the whole destruction of Hinduism,” he mentioned.

“So, I wish to ask the Congress and Rahul Gandhi, has the Congress began pursuing this system of Eradication of Sanatana Dharma, that means the whole destruction of Hinduism, and has it instructed its Chief Ministers to launch direct assaults on Indian tradition and the deities of Hinduism?” the BJP chief mentioned, additionally asking at whose occasion the “agenda” was being carried ahead.