New Delhi: Calling it a “bogus problem” to the need of late businessman Sunjay Kapur, his spouse Priya on Wednesday informed. Delhi excessive courtroom that incorrect spellings or addresses cannot be grounds to invalidate the doc.Rebutting the allegations leveled by Kapur’s ex-wife Karisma Kapoor‘s youngsters that the need was cast, Priya’s counsel Rajiv Nayyar informed the courtroom that nobody had disputed or denied Sunjay’s signatures or these of the opposite two witnesses.The one floor to problem the need, he informed Justice Jyoti Singh, was if the deceased was not of sound thoughts, was beneath coercion, or was beneath some incapacity to execute the need. He informed HC there was “nothing uncommon within the bequest” since “in spouse vs spouse he would clearly identify the current spouse as beneficiary over an estranged spouse”. The plea of the plaintiffs, Samaira and Kiaan Raj, was bereft of any reason behind motion, he argued.“Now I’m informed there are 4 extra grounds to invalidate a will — fallacious spelling, fallacious tackle, writing testatrix as an alternative of testator, and closeness of witnesses,” Nayyar stated.“There have been two alternatives for the plaintiff. There was a will studying. It was learn out to everybody, together with the plaintiff… The swimsuit was filed on Sept 9. There is no such thing as a reference or problem to the need within the plaint. The need was shared with them on Sept 15. They have been acutely aware of the existence of the need way back to July 30, previous to the submitting of the swimsuit. Right now we’re coping with a non-existent problem to the need” he stated.