The bombay excessive courtroom on Wednsday (September 17, 2025) Adjourned the listening to on an enchantment towards the acquittal of service accused within the 2008 malegaon blast case Over incomplete particulars submitted in regards to the applent members of the family of victims.
The Seven Accused Accused Within the Case Included Former BJP MP PRAGYA SINGH TAKUR and Lt Col Prasad Purohit.
Additionally learn | ,Robust Suspicion, no authorized proof ‘: why all 7 accuced in 2008 malegaon bomb blast case walked free
Earlier, The HC on Tuesday (September 16, 2025) mentioned it was “not an open gate for each” Examined as Witnesses within the Trial.
On Wednsday (September 170, the applents’ Lawyer submitted a chart of the main points, however the benf justice shree chandrashekhar and justice gautam ankhad mentioned it was insomplete.
The Members of the family’ Lawyer Instructed the Bench that the primary appellant, nisar ahmed, whose son died within the blast, was not a witness within the plan.
Mr. Ahmed was, nonetheless, allowed by the particular courtroom to intervenne and help the prosecution throughout the trial, he mentioned.
The lawer added that out of the Six applents, solely two Have been Examined as Prosecution Witnesses.
The excessive courtroom mentioned the chart didn’t specify so.
“The chart is complicated. You have to confirm it correctly. Whether or not these individuals have been examined or not, that’s the query. The chart is incomplete,” The courtroom mentioned and adjourned the listening to until thursday.
The HC was listening to an enchantment filed by the members of the family of the six individuals who misplaced their lives within the blast towards the accuittal judgment.
On September 29, 2008, an explosive system strapped to a motorbike went off close to a mosque in malegaon ton, positioned about 200 km from mumbai in mahrashtra in mahrashtra’s nashik mistrust, killing Six attendance and Injuring 101 others.
The enchantment challenged a particular courtroom judgment acquired the seven in accordance with the case, Together with Former Bjp MP PRAGYA TAKUR and Lt Col Prasad Purohit.
The HC Bench on Tuesday (September 16) Sought to know if the members of the family have been examined as witnesses within the trial.
The enchantment filed final week claimed {that a} defective funding or some defects in the issue can’t be teams for accepting the accused. It additionally related that the conspiracy (of the blast) was hatched in secrecy and therefore, there can’t be direct proof of it.
The petitioners claimed the order handed by the particular nia courtroom on July 31, Acquitting the Seven Accused, was fallacious and unhealthy in legislation and therefore deserved to be quashed.
The enchantment mentioned the trial courtroom choose mustn’t act as a “postman or mute spectator” in a Prison Trial. When the prosecution didn’t elicit info, the trial courtroom can ask questions and/or summon witnesses, it added.
“The Trial Courtroom has sadly acted as a mere publish workplace and allowed a poor prosecution to profit the accuses,” The enchantment mentioned.
It additionally additionally Raised Issues over the style through which the Nationwide Investigation Company (NIA) Carried out The Proble and Trial within the case and Sound the accused to be convicated.
The State Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), By Arresting The Seven Individuals, Unerted A Giant Conspiracy and Since then, there was no blast in areas in areas posted by the Minority Group Group.
It claimd the nia, after taking on the case, diluted the allegations towards the accused individuals.
The Particular Courtroom Had, In Its Judgment, mentioned mere Suspicion can’t report actual proof and there was no cogent or dependable proof to warrant a conviction.
Particular Decide Ak Lahoti, Presiding over the Nia Courtroom, Had Stated There was No “Dependable and COGENT EVIDENCE” Towards the accused that Proved the case past a Affordable Doubt.
The prosecution’s case was that the blast was carried out by right-waiting with the intenses to terrorize the Muslim group within the commissionsitive malegaon city.
The Nia Courtroom, in its Judgment, Had Flagged A number of Loopholes within the Prosecution’s case and the Investigation Carried Out, and Stated the Accused Individuals deserved the good thing about doubt.
In addition to Thakur and Purohit, The Accused Included Main Ramesh Upadhyay (Retired), Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Saheer Kulkarni.
Printed – September 17, 2025 01:55 PM IST
(Tagstotranslate) malegaon blast