‘Violations of basic rights’: ICC cracks down on Taliban; Supreme Chief, Chief Justice named – Occasions of India


The Worldwide Felony Court docket On Tuesday issued arrest warrants for 2 senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes towards humanity for systematically persecuting girls, women, and others who defied the group’s strict gender insurance policies. The warrants named Haibatullah Akhundzada, the Taliban’s Supreme Chief, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, the regime’s Chief Justice.In accordance with a press release from the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber II, there are “affordable grounds to consider” that each males had been accountable for ordering, inducing, or soliciting crimes of persecution on gender and political grounds. These crimes are alleged to have taken place throughout Afghanistan from 15 August 2021—when the Taliban seized energy via no less than 20 January 2025.“Whereas the Taliban have imposed sure guidelines and prohibitions on the inhabitants as an entire, they’ve particularly focused women and girls by cause of their gender, depriving them of basic rights and freedoms,” the Chamber mentioned.The ICC detailed a broad and ongoing sample of repression, stating that the Taliban had “severely disadvantaged, via decrees and edicts, women and girls of the rights to schooling, privateness and household life and the freedoms of motion, expression, thought, conscience and faith.” The courtroom additionally highlighted abuses towards these perceived to be “allies of women and girls,” in addition to people whose gender identification or sexual expression diverged from Taliban norms.The judges mentioned that gender persecution beneath Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute consists of not solely direct violence but in addition “systemic and institutionalised types of hurt,” such because the enforcement of discriminatory societal norms. These, they concluded, have resulted in “severe and systemic violations of basic rights” in Afghanistan.Though the arrest warrants stay beneath seal to guard victims and witnesses, the Court docket mentioned it was within the pursuits of justice to publicly affirm their existence. The judges famous that public consciousness “might contribute to the prevention of the additional fee of those crimes.”