On June 5, whereas addressing a public gathering in Bihar’s Saran district, Prashant Kishor stirred controversy by questioning Lalu Prasad Yadav’s ambitions for his son Tejashwi Yadav, declaring that the RJD chief had not even accomplished his education.
Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief and former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav has responded firmly to political strategist and Jan Suraaj Occasion founder Prashant Kishor’s remarks questioning his instructional {qualifications}. Kishor had lately taken a dig at Yadav, highlighting that the RJD chief had not handed Class 10.
“Levels don’t assure management”: Tejashwi’s Rebuttal
Tejashwi on Sunday (June 22) dismissed the criticism, asserting that management, competence, and public service usually are not solely decided by tutorial {qualifications}. “No, it would not harm me. You’ll be able to’t get all of the qualities simply by having a level,” he mentioned.
He added that sensible life expertise, together with his background as an expert cricketer, has performed an important position in shaping his skills. “I used to be a sportsperson, I’m a cricketer—he received’t speak about that,” Tejashwi famous, subtly critiquing Kishor’s one-dimensional give attention to teachers.
Tejashwi cites PM Modi in Defence
Yadav additionally introduced up the long-standing debate round Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s tutorial credentials, declaring that demanding transparency in instructional background is selective. “If it was nearly levels, then for 11 years, the nation nonetheless doesn’t know what his diploma is. However the questions come to us,” he mentioned.
He emphasised that respect must be given to these in excessive workplace, regardless of instructional background, stating, “We respect whoever is given the best submit.”
Kishor’s sharp assault on RJD management
On June 5, Prashant Kishor sparked the controversy throughout a public deal with in Bihar’s Saran district, the place he questioned Lalu Prasad Yadav’s aspirations for his son, regardless of Tejashwi not finishing his education.
“Lalu ji’s son didn’t cross ninth grade, however he desires him to be the king of Bihar,” Kishor mentioned. “Individuals say we criticise him, however really we’re praising him. We must always study from Lalu ji how one can take care of our kids.”
Kishor contrasted Tejashwi’s political rise with the struggles of bizarre college students who, regardless of graduating, face unemployment.
Debate over benefit, privilege, and politics
The change has reignited a broader debate about meritocracy versus dynasty politics, and whether or not formal schooling must be the defining yardstick in public management. Whereas Kishor’s feedback attraction to aspirational voters, Tejashwi’s response underscores the worth of expertise, public connection, and private functionality in political life.