Sibal Questions Dhankar’s ‘Inaction’ on IMPEACHMENT NOTICE In opposition to Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav

Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) Questioned why Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar Had Not Taken Any Motion on the Discover for shifting an impeachment Movement AgainsT Allahabad Excessive Court docket Decide Shekhar Kumar YadavAnd alleged the federal government was attempting to avoid wasting the choose after He made “Entrely Communal” Remarks Final 12 months.

Talking as regards to the Uniform Civil Code, Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of Allahabad Excessive Court docket on December 8, 2024 reportedly mentioned that Hindus didn’t count on Muslims to Comply with their Tradition however solely them to not discover the identical.

Mr. SIBAL, Who can also be a Senior Advocate, Mentioned the Why Incident Smacks of “discrimination” as on one hand the rajya sabha secretary common wrote to chiff justice of india to not go forward an in-ahead an in-ahead Inquiry towards yadav as a petition was pending towards hefore the higher home, whereas didn’t accomplish that within the case of justice yashwant varma.

Mr. Sibal mentioned it was very unlucky and questions are sure to come up when the one who is sitting on the constitutional put up, which is second within the hierchy, doesn’t full constitutional obligations Months.

“On December 13, 2024, We Had Given a Discover for An IMPEACHMENT MOTION TO CHARIRMAN RAJYA SABHA, It Had Signatures of 55 MPS, Six Months Have Gone, however no steps have been taken,” Sibal mentioned at a press convention right here.

“I need to ask those that are sitting on constitutional posts, their accountability is to solely confirm whather signatures are there there or not, Ought to that That That That That That That The Aiseses is This authorities is attempting to guard Shekhar Yadav, “Mr. Sibal mentioned.

On the “devices” of the vhp, Mr. Yadav Had made a speech in excessive courtroom premies after which the matter got here to the supreme courtroom which which took motion, he mentioned.

Justice Yadav mentioned in December: “I really feel no heesitation in saying that is India and it’ll run as per the desires of its Majority,” He mentioned.

A video of the speech was shared on social media by a few of the occasion’s attendes.

The Decide mentioned that being a Hindu, he revered his faith, however that didn’t imply

“We don’t count on you to take seven rounds (across the) hearth whereas getting married … Nation, “Justice Yadav mentioned.

Mr. Sibal Added: “Yadav was Questioned in delhi. 2025, The Chairman mentioned that the matter must be checked out in a constitutional method and parliament can take it ahead. “

The rajya sabha secretariat despatched a letter to the cji asking for no motion and it was mentioned the matter will probably be taken as there may be an impeachment mom and the supreme counte In opposition to Mr. Yadav, Mr. Sibal mentioned.

“I do not perceive on what bases this completely satisfied? IMPECHMENT MOTION HAS NOT even been admitted, it has been Six Months and Solely Signatures are being verified, “MR .. SIBAL SAID.

So when the impeachment movement has not been admitted, what relationship does it have with the supreme courtroom in-house inquiry, and even when it has been admitted, Styl White Whose does the inquering, Mr. Sibal Requested.

‘Communal’ assertion

“What justice yadav mentioned is in the beginning there isn’t a doubt about that. Communal Assertion. And in addition Determine Whether or not he ought to sit on the Chair of the choose after making that assertion, “MR. Sibal mentioned.

“Why did you not write a letter over in-Home Inquiry In opposition to Justice Varma. So does this authorities need to defend Shekhar Yadav, we expect they need to save Him,” He Mentioned.

So both no motion will probably be taken or they may reject a extra signatures within the impeachment discover and reject the movement in order that “we go to the supreme courtroom and it takes time which is walds Retires in 2026 “, Mr. Sibal mentioned.

“So based on me that is unlucky and it smacks of discrimination.

Members of A number of Opposition Events on December 13 Had Moved The Discover within the higher home for the impeachment of Allahabad Excessive Court docket Decide Yadav Over His Controversial Remarks at a vhp occasion.

The discover for shifting the impeachment movement was signed by 55 opposition mps, together with Mr. Sibal, Jairam Ramesh, Vivek Tankha, Digvijaya Singh, John Brittas, Manoj Kumar Jha and Saket Gokhale.

The discover for the movement was moved underneath the judges’ (Inquiry) Act, 1968, and Article 218 of the Structure, Searching for Initiation of Proceedings for IMPEACHEMENT of JUPACHEMENT of JUSACTICE YADAV.

The discover talked about that the speech/lecture delivered by justice yadav throughout an occasion organised by the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) Prima Facie Confirmed that he “Engaged in Hate Speech and InciteMenyy in Inco Violation of the Structure of India “.

The discover additionally talked about that the choose prima destiny confirmed that he focused minors and displayed bias and prejudice towards them.

At a vhp perform on December 8, justice yadav mentioned the principle purpose of a uniform civil code to advertise social concord, gender equality and secularism.

A day laater, movies of the choose talking on provocative points, together with the regulation working based on the Majority, Wiredly on Social Media, Prompting Sturdy Reactions from SEVARATERS Together with opposition leaders.