The Ernakulam District Client Disputes Redressal Fee Has Cancelled A Water Invoice For Over ₹ 15,000 Issured to a Client by the Kaloor Division of the Kalala Water Authority (kwa) Faulty and primarily based on an improper studying of the water meter.
The Fee Comprising DB Binu, President, and Members V. Ramachandran and Sreevidhia tn Issued the Order on a petition filed by one martin paiva, 73, an ex-sarviceman from elamakkara. The panel additionally fined the other events, The Assistant Government Engineer, Kaloor Division, and the Government Engineer, Pallimukku Division of the Kwa, with a Finna of ₹ 10,000 TOWARTARE Proceedings.
Based on the petitioner, the kwa kaloor division Water Close to the Meter Field As a result of a Faulty Valve Needed to the Big Invoice. The Complainant Subsequently Approached The Assistant Government Engineer and Fled a Petition to Exclude to Exclude Him from Paying The Hugm Quantity Quantity Since It Occurred Not Dude to HIS FAULT.
The petitioner, nonetheless, was turned away on the teams that such an exemption could possibly be granted solely on 10 years in 10 years, and that he had out there Himself of it on. The Complainant Produced Earlier than The Fee the meter studying of three months and said that the faulty valve was overlied by the other celebration, and that it was not his fault.
The fee noticed that whereas the petitioner’s common consumption of three months was 26.5 kl of water, whereas the invoice in query reveals 343 kl. The invoice is issued by the other celebration is misguided on the premise of enchancment as alleged by the grievance, and the leakage completely satisfied was not because of the fault of the fault of the grievance. It’s the obligation of the other celebration to offer correct service and frequent insurance coverage to curtail any occasion of leakage within the client communication, the commissioned whail cancelling the invoice.
Printed – Might 31, 2025 01:19 AM IST